We have worked with Alloyed Ltd to design and validate alloys meant to be strong contenders as candidates for making orthopaedic and medical devices.
There are three aspects that we consider when we study alloys in the MMM Lab: their physical and mechanical performance, their chemistry, and their biological behaviour (once the alloys are exposed to living cells, esp. those that are meant to form bone).
This multiobjective optimisation revealed a very interesting candidate:
There was an alloy that climbed to the top of our shortlisting, and the combination of alloying elements has also attracted much interest from the scientific community: a Titanium alloy containing TiNbTaZrMoSn elements. This alloy is attractive because it does not contain toxic elements (such as Al, V or Ni), and is meant to be a beta-stabilised alloy, which means that its stiffness is lower than that of pure Titanium and therefore closer to that of bone.
In the first instance Alloyed Ltd used computational methods to predict which combination of those elements, and in which quantities, would render the optimum alloy with regards to stiffness, strength, transition temperature and biocompatibility. The selected alloy was then realised in our Multifunctional Materials Lab and tested for physical, mechanical, chemical and biological performance. The experimental results were then compared to the predictions we had for this designed alloy.
While the thermomechanical computational predictions matched reality well, the biological behaviour results were way off.
It looks as if the body of work that has led to models and numerical calculations of the metallurgical phase, the mechanical properties and the transition temperatures have reached maturity. However, this is not the case for the biological prediction models of biocompatibility and osteoblastogenesis (i.e., how fast and well cells commit to becoming a bone-forming cell). These models are still too simplistic and we will have to consider more aspects of the cell/surface/bulk interaction to make them faithful to what is going on in reality. In this way we will be able to run in-silico predictions which will yield trustworthy results. This would be game-changing, as we will be able to accelerate the design & manufacture & deployment cycle that medical devices require to achieve better products to help heal faster and long-term. For example, tailoring materials to the patient to fulfil their personalised needs.
This work has been published in the Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials and can be read here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104858…


collaboration, Healthcare, Industry, journals, multidisciplinarity, porous materials, Projects, Publications, structure
WHICH 3D PRINTED STRUCTURE IS MOST CELL FRIENDLY?
In Comment, Publications on 2026/09/07 at 3:51 amOrthopedics This Week (OTW) has reported on our study of topology to improve osteogenesis in load-bearing implants.
They interviewed us and quoted this extract from that interview as follows:
The full interview can be read here.
The study that this interview is referring to can be found here. The sponsors are EPSRC/UKRI and our inductrial partners are Alloyed Ltd and Core Specialist Services Ltd.